Monday, January 10, 2011

Violence vs." Blessed are the Peacemakers"

We have experienced yet another act of violence in the USA, in a time that should have been a nice Sat. afternoon. Representative Giffords doing what she loved to do; meet with her constituents, and address their concerns. A young 9 year old girl attended out of excitement in meeting her congressional representative, after her own election in student government. But instead of excitement she lost her life, along with 5 others, and 19 injured, including Rep. Giffords. Instead of this being a nice Saturday, a troubled young man with a hatred of government, and paranoid characteristics, opened fire, changing the lives forever. January 8th, 2011 will live in our hearts for a long time, if not forever as a tragic day in our history.

My trouble with this is that there are so many factors that led up to this moment, that made this carnage possible. This incident didn't happen in a vacuum. We live in the most violent country of the "civilized" world. We have the least amount of gun control laws that would prevent these incidents, and Arizona has the weakest level of gun control laws in the US to protect the innocent. One of the most glaring to me, is why on earth a young man with mental problems can go in and legally purchase a gun. But he was able to do so. While I understand that gun control is not the only solution to this problem, it does have a huge part in whether or not this can happen again. Just ask the police officers all over our country.

We have had many glaring examples of very violent speech as well from right wing politicians, and commentators of late as well, including Sarah Palin, having a map of the US, with points on the map of political elections that she was "aiming for" to overcome. Those points on the map intentionally made to look like a scope of a gun, with the cross hairs. Her language was war like. "We don't retreat, we re-load." It is too easy to now say, "I didn't mean to shoot someone." It is a lie for her to say she doesn't like violence. It permeates her words continuously.

The candidate who ran against Rep. Giffords used the language of using an M-16, to "remove" her from her office, and Glenn Beck spoke openly on his show about wanting to "Kill" Michael Moore, and debated himself about whether he should do it on his own or hire someone. He concluded that he could do it himself and just put his hands around his neck. And I want to know when we got to the place of talking about killing someone for believing differently than us? And the answer is, slowly and one incident at a time. Somewhere along the line, we have failed to realize that we are talking about real human beings with families and friends, and colleagues, who love them. We have somehow become hardened or maybe numb to the violent language that barrages us through the movie screens, the Television screens, and especially in our political discourse of the last few years.

It has been said,
"This is a time of shame and sorrow. It is not a day for politics. I have saved this one opportunity, my only event of today, to speak briefly to you about the mindless menace of violence in America which again stains our land and every one of our lives. It is not the concern of any one race. The victims of the violence are black and white, rich and poor, young and old, famous and unknown. They are, most important of all, human beings whom other human beings loved and needed. No one - no matter where he lives or what he does - can be certain who will suffer from some senseless act of bloodshed. And yet it goes on and on and on in this country of ours. Why? What has violence ever accomplished? What has it ever created? No martyr's cause has ever been stilled by an assassin's bullet. No wrongs have ever been righted by riots and civil disorders. A sniper is only a coward, not a hero; and an uncontrolled, uncontrollable mob is only the voice of madness, not the voice of reason. Whenever any American's life is taken by another American unnecessarily - whether it is done in the name of the law or in the defiance of the law, by one man or a gang, in cold blood or in passion, in an attack of violence or in response to violence - whenever we tear at the fabric of the life which another man has painfully and clumsily woven for himself and his children, the whole nation is degraded. "

These words were spoken by Robert Kennedy, over 40 years ago, but the words speak so profoundly to us today. We obviously haven't learned much. We haven't developed as humanity to realize that violence solves nothing. We just keep perpetuating the cycle of violence over and over. On one of the many websites available for people to record their opinions or emotions of this incident in Tucson, some troubled soul stated that it was ok that the 9 year old girl was killed because she "most likely would have become a liberal politician anyway." What possesses a person to make such an unfeeling, and stupid comment? A 9 year old girl should die because of what she "might become?" What happens in a spirit or soul of someone that causes them to degrade themselves and the value of a life so much that they can make a statement such as this??

I have lots of questions, and a few answers for myself, but what I am convinced of is we need to tone down the rhetoric, speak up when people speak in violent tones, and not just walk away in disgust. The more we tolerate, the more it will continue. Although Jesus spoke of turning the cheek, he also turned over a few tables. But he never gave permission to kill another person. We each need to examine our own hearts, for those parts of us that have the potential for violence, and work to change our ways. We need to teach our children far better coping skills when confronted with issues of conflict, but we all need to be aware of the power of our words. Our words do have the potential to influence anothers' actions. We have the choice of speaking for peace or for violence. I choose peace.

4 Comments:

At January 20, 2011 at 7:05 PM , Blogger Shifty1 said...

ACTUALLY Susan,

Jared Loughner did NOT purchase a gun leagally. He committed several felonies when he knowingly and willfully lied while filling out the paperwork to purchase the gun.
He lied on the ATF form 4473, which specifies that if he answered "yes" to the following question: "Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?" he would be INELIGIBLE to purchase the firearm.

Here is part of the form that lays out the penalties for lying on the form.

"I certify that my answers to Section A are true, correct, and complete. I have read and understand the Notices, Instructions, and Definitions on ATF Form 4473. I understand that answering “yes” to question 11.a. if I am not the actual buyer is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal law and may also violate State and/or Local law. I understand that a person who answers “yes” to any of the questions 11.b through 11.k is prohibited from purchasing or receiving a firearm unless the person also answers “yes” to question 12. I also understand that making any false oral or written statement or exhibiting any false or misrepresented identification with respect to this transaction is a crime punishable as a felony under Federal laws, and may also violate State and/or local law. I further understand that the repetitive purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of law."

Once he asserted that he was not an "unlawful user" of marijuana, and then signed the form, he was, in fact, a felon. He did NOT buy the gun legally.

Next?

 
At January 20, 2011 at 7:12 PM , Blogger Shifty1 said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At January 20, 2011 at 7:13 PM , Blogger Shifty1 said...

"but what I am convinced of is we need to tone down the rhetoric, speak up when people speak in violent tones, and not just walk away in disgust. The more we tolerate, the more it will continue."

Can I expect a blog entry calling President Obama, the DNC and most recently Tennessee Representative Steve Cohen to task for their violent tones? Or will you continue to tolerate it...unless it comes from the right side of the political spectrum?

On a side note....

Didn't Jesus tell his disciples, before he sent them out to evangelize, to purchase a sword, if they didn't already have one? Wasn't a sword the "gun" of that time period? Hmmmmmm......

 
At February 2, 2011 at 7:51 PM , Blogger SusanWM said...

Shifty1, thanks for your comments. To the first one: The fact that one can so easily lie on the form and still get a gun only proves the need for reform. What drug addict do you know is going to answer yes to that question knowing it will prohibit him/her from obtaining the gun? Not many.

As to the second comment,I didn't specify only republicans on that, I said, we need to tone down the violent rhetoric. But, tell me what President Obama has said in the way of violent tones? The blatant ones I am referring to are things like Glenn Beck saying he wants to kill Michael Moore, and is trying to decide whether he could do it himself or hire someone, but concludes he can do it himself by putting his hands around his neck. Also, Sarah Palin's map with the crosshairs and people's name on a target list, the senator who ran against Gabby who spoke of having an M-16 or AK-47 to "Take her out of her chair." While he says it was symbolic, it is blatantly violent tones, of which I have NEVER heard anyone on the Democratic side say anything close. So you show me a direct quote, and I will write them myself and call them out on the same request, to stop the violent language. It has no place in a civilized society.

And to your third question, Jesus told Peter to put his sword down when the soldiers came to arrest him. He also told his disciples to turn the other cheek, he taught "blessed are the peacemakers."

And again, I will say, I am not against a person owning a gun for hunting purposes. I do not however believe that anyone should be able to own a gun, such as an AK-47, or an M-16, unless they are in the military or the police force. There is no need. We live in the most violent country of the civilized world and it is directly tied to the fact that our gun control laws are too lax.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home